Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Host City Preparation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,340 of 16,562 topics). This Host City Preparation is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Host City Preparation
Topic details
Total words: 2,632
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos