Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Host City Experience results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,081 hits . Analysis detected 6,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,497 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Host City Experience is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Host City Experience
Topic details
Total words: 7,497
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst