Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Horse Racing results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 522 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,749 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,083 of 16,562 topics). This Horse Racing is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Horse Racing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,749
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 2.2%2.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos