Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hope results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 1,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Hope is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hope
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos