Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Honolulu results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 1,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,122 of 16,562 topics). This Honolulu is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Honolulu
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,576
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 4.2%4.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos