Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video1,399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homelessness Services results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 4,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,197 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,413 of 16,562 topics). This Homelessness Services is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Homelessness Services
Topic details
Total words: 4,197
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.4%12.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos