Topic summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home Sales results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 1,562 hits . Analysis detected 7,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,531 of 16,327 topics). This Home Sales is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Home Sales
Topic details
Total words: 6,168
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.1% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 25.3% 25.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 24.4% 24.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 21.3% 21.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst