Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Home Advantage results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 448 hits. Analysis detected 3,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Home Advantage is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Home Advantage
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.6%14.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 14.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos