Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hollywood Inc results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 704 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,713 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,852 of 16,562 topics). This Hollywood Inc is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Hollywood Inc
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,713
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos