Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hollywood Golden Age results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 3,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,142 of 16,562 topics). This Hollywood Golden Age is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Hollywood Golden Age
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠57%Hollywood Golden Age (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,612
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos