Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hollywood Casting results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 4,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Hollywood Casting is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hollywood Casting
Topic details
Total words: 3,012
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.6%20.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.9%16.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos