Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hoaxes And Scams results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Hoaxes And Scams is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hoaxes And Scams
Topic details
Total words: 2,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos