Topic summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hoarding results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 569 hits. Analysis detected 4,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,392 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,117 of 16,562 topics). This Hoarding is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Hoarding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,392
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos