Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These History Of Gerrymandering results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 980 faulty-reasoning hits from 303 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17% and a BS Rank of 98% (374 of 16,562 topics). This History Of Gerrymandering is worse (more manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
History Of Gerrymandering
Topic details
Total words: 303
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.7% percentile
17.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles303 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 34.3%34.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 37.0%37.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 21.1%21.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 19.8%19.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.7%29.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 36.3%36.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 10.6%10.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 37.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 34.3%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.7%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos