Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video1,644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These History Of Computing results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 4,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,042 of 16,562 topics). This History Of Computing is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
History Of Computing
Topic details
Total words: 4,932
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos