Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historical Speeches results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 2,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,248 of 16,562 topics). This Historical Speeches is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Historical Speeches
Topic details
Total words: 1,800
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.1%19.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.7%20.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos