Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Historical Review results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 550 hits. Analysis detected 3,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,436 topics). This Historical Review is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Historical Review
Topic details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 18.2%18.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.3%4.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos