Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historical Reenactments results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 3,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,799 of 16,562 topics). This Historical Reenactments is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Historical Reenactments
Topic details
Total words: 5,584
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos