Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Historical Battles results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 2,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,003 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Historical Battles is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Historical Battles
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Historical Battles (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,003
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos