Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historic Housing Co Op results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 882 hits . Analysis detected 3,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,219 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,030 of 15,888 topics). This Historic Housing Co Op is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Historic Housing Co Op
Topic details
Total words: 2,219
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.9% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 30.3% 30.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 39.8% 39.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 39.8%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 30.3%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst