Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hiring Initiatives results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 2,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,666 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Hiring Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hiring Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 3,666
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos