Topic summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Highway Naming results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 123 hits . Analysis detected 634 faulty-reasoning hits from 771 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,656 of 16,562 topics). This Highway Naming is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Highway Naming
Topic details
Total words: 771
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.9% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles771 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst