Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High School Workshops results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 1,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,522 of 16,562 topics). This High School Workshops is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
High School Workshops
Topic details
Total words: 4,124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos