Topic summary
76% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,000 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High School Sports results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 2,819 hits . Analysis detected 19,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,680 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,830 of 15,758 topics). This High School Sports is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. High School Sports
Topic details
Total words: 18,680
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst