Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hepatitis B results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50.5% saturation with 848 hits. Analysis detected 5,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,465 of 16,562 topics). This Hepatitis B is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Hepatitis B
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠92%Hepatitis B (selected)10%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,680
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.2% percentile
9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 43.1%43.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 50.5%50.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 18.8%18.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 25.5%25.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.1%16.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 25.7%25.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.8%16.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 50.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 43.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos