Topic summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hearings results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 2,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,643 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,260 of 16,562 topics). This Hearings is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Hearings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,643
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.7%19.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos