Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Healthspan Extension results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 638 hits. Analysis detected 4,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,063 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Healthspan Extension is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Healthspan Extension
Topic details
Total words: 3,063
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 20.8%20.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.3%17.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos