Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Science And Environment results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 457 hits. Analysis detected 4,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,157 of 16,562 topics). This Health Science And Environment is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Health Science And Environment
Topic details
Total words: 7,624
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos