Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Scams results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 374 hits . Analysis detected 2,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,696 of 16,562 topics). This Health Scams is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Health Scams
Topic details
Total words: 4,660
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst