Topic summary
⁠50%5 analyzed articles/videos2,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Monitoring results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,467 hits. Analysis detected 12,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,118 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,501 of 16,562 topics). This Health Monitoring is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Health Monitoring
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos