Topic summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video1,872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Care Access results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 642 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (17,920 of 20,842 topics). This Health Care Access is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Health Care Access
Topic details
Total words: 5,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos