Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hbo Max results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hindsight Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 1,408 hits . Analysis detected 4,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Hbo Max is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Hbo Max
Topic details
Total words: 3,580
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 39.3% 39.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst