Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Habitat Loss results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 1,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,547 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Habitat Loss is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Habitat Loss
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,547
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos