Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guild Awards results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Hindsight Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 319 faulty-reasoning hits from 652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,470 of 16,562 topics). This Guild Awards is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Guild Awards
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles652 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.7%14.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos