Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ground Zero Documents results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 655 hits. Analysis detected 2,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,157 of 16,562 topics). This Ground Zero Documents is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Ground Zero Documents
Topic details
Total words: 3,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos