Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grocery Delivery results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 62.6% saturation with 929 hits . Analysis detected 3,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,485 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of 98% (435 of 16,562 topics). This Grocery Delivery is worse (more manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group. Grocery Delivery
Topic details
Total words: 1,485
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.4% percentile 16.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 62.6% 62.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 40.5% 40.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 48.8% 48.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 25.4% 25.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.9% 15.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Optimism Bias: Topic 62.6%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Topic 48.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 40.5%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst