Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video598 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Byrne results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 2,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,450 of 16,562 topics). This Greg Byrne is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Greg Byrne
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,392
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.2%26.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos