Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green Bay Packers results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 502 hits. Analysis detected 3,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ā 91% (1,496 of 15,780 topics). This Green Bay Packers is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Green Bay Packers
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 91%Green Bay Packers (selected)10%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 40.2%40.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 28.7%28.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 39.5%39.5%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 14.8%14.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.0%27.0%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anchoring Bias: Topic 40.2%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Topic 39.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos