Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green Agenda results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 2,034 hits. Analysis detected 12,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,187 of 16,562 topics). This Green Agenda is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Green Agenda
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 36.9%36.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 19.2%19.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 16.9%16.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.7%14.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos