Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great White Sharks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 2,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,788 of 16,562 topics). This Great White Sharks is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Great White Sharks
Topic details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos