Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graphical User Interface results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 341 hits . Analysis detected 2,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of â 53% (7,882 of 16,562 topics). This Graphical User Interface is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Graphical User Interface
Topic details
Total words: 2,832
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product⌠Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst