Topic summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos1,686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grant Programs results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 703 hits. Analysis detected 2,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,744 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (19,403 of 23,503 topics). This Grant Programs is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Grant Programs
Topic details
Total words: 6,744
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos