Topic summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grand Jury Proceedings results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 1,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,485 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,300 of 16,562 topics). This Grand Jury Proceedings is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Grand Jury Proceedings
Topic details
Total words: 1,485
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.0% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.5%22.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos