Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graffiti Art results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 2,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,019 of 16,446 topics). This Graffiti Art is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Graffiti Art
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,882
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos