Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Support results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 1,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,169 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,530 of 15,689 topics). This Government Support is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Government Support
Topic details
Total words: 2,169
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.1%8.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos