Topic summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Staffing results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 2,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,900 of 15,330 topics). This Government Staffing is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Government Staffing
Topic details
Total words: 2,742
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.5%13.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.7%15.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos