Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Relations results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 749 hits. Analysis detected 4,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,290 of 16,562 topics). This Government Relations is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Government Relations
Topic details
Total words: 4,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.3%16.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos