Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Government Procurement results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 498 faulty-reasoning hits from 244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Government Procurement is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Government Procurement
Topic details
Total words: 244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles244 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 36.9%36.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.0%25.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 18.4%18.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.4%18.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.4%18.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 36.9%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 18.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos