Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Nominations results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 2,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,293 of 16,562 topics). This Government Nominations is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Government Nominations
Topic details
Total words: 2,128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.0% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.0%27.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos