Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Fraud results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 288 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,197 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,821 of 16,562 topics). This Government Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Government Fraud
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,197
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos